The environmental impact of crypto

At Vivid, we believe it’s essential to understand how trading and staking activities affect the environment. This page outlines the impact of different blockchain technologies and explains how we ensure compliance with the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCAR).

Trustpilot: Excellent! | 25,000+ reviews

Please review our website to understand the scope of our services and our Privacy notice for the use and handling of your data.

Celebrating excellence
Some of our latest achievements and recognitions
Top Mobile Banking 2026
Handelsblatt
Industry Leader 2026
F.A.Z. Institut
Best SME Service Provider 2026
WirtschaftsWoche
German Service Award 2026
DISQ Institut
Best Business Account 2026
Für Gründer

Understanding the environmental footprint of your activity

Proof of Work vs Proof of Stake

The two main blockchain validation methods differ significantly in their environmental impact. Proof of Work (PoW) relies on energy-intensive mining, while Proof of Stake (PoS) offers a more sustainable alternative by selecting validators based on their staked assets.

Trading and the environment

Transactions on energy-intensive PoW networks indirectly contribute to carbon emissions. Trading on PoS-based networks helps reduce indirect emissions caused by transaction validation. At Vivid, we support both PoW and PoS assets, but encourage sustainable choices in line with MiCAR principles.

Staking: A greener way to support blockchain

Staking on Proof of Stake networks is far more energy-efficient than traditional mining — consuming up to 99.9% less electricity. It also produces significantly lower carbon emissions and avoids the electronic waste caused by constant hardware upgrades.

Sustainable choices in crypto

Choosing more energy-efficient blockchain networks helps you reduce your environmental footprint. At Vivid, we support conscious crypto use — with tools and services aligned with MiCAR sustainability standards.